Shareholder disagreements and disputes are surprisingly common. They can range from differences of opinion about strategy to situtaions where shareholders consider are have grounds to supect that the company is only being run, or is being manipulated, for the benefit of only a small number or by the controlling shareholder.
In almost every case, swift action and good legal advice are essential. Much will also depend on whether the aggrieved shareholders have influence or control at director level of the company and the extent to which there is a clear shareholders agreement or suitable articles of association which can be relied on to support a clear resolution of the disagreement, or, where there is a full blown dispute, allegations that the other parties are not acting in accordance with previous agreements.
Legal advice on unfair prejudice claims
It is difficult and expensive under the Companies Act 2006 for a minority shareholder to take formal court action, but the threat of such an application, and skillful negotiation can deliver results.
If a court considers that there has been unfair prejudice, it can make a range of Orders including that the company must be wound up, but the most common remedy, over and above possibly awarding legal costs of the action, will be an Order that the company or majority shareholder(s) purchase the minority shares at a “fair value” to be independently valued.
The courts have wide discretion in this area and orders can include :-
Contact us either to ensure that shareholders rights are properly clarified and contractually agreed at the outset, for help with amending articles or advice as to ways to avoid a dispute in future or for advice and assistance in the case of a shareholder dispute.
With small companies it is very common for there to be 2 founders and shareholders, and for understandable reasons, typically there will be a 50:50 ownership of shares. However, as a company grows, this brings with it key strategic and operational decisions and a 50:50 arrangement will also often mean that if there is a difference of opinion.
If unresolved, the company will not move forward and bitterness can develop very quickly. A good shareholder agreement will generally include a formula for dealing with deadlock, which, as a last resort, may result in a mechanism and a formula for resolution or even for one party to buy the other out.
If your shareholders agreement is silent and there is deadlock, possibilities can include :-
If you need legal advice on a shareholder dispute, please do get on touch.